Assess · Build · Enable — for teams shipping Claude

the model is rarely the problem.

We help engineering teams get Claude systems past the demo: integrated, secure, evaluated, and run by their own people.

Get in touch See services

how we help

four ways it goes wrong

  1. 1

    The architecture was wrong, and now it's expensive to switch

    A pattern that suited the demo gets locked in before anyone asks what the system must do at scale, under audit, or when the model changes.

    Prevented by Assess →
  2. 2

    The integration skipped security review, so it never ships

    Security finds the design late, sends it back, and the project stalls between proof of concept and production.

    Prevented by Build →
  3. 3

    A safety control everyone assumed was there fails at the worst moment

    Screening and authorisation that were never placed deliberately don't fail closed when an input or tool call goes wrong.

    Prevented by Build →
  4. 4

    The design only one person understands collapses at handoff

    Configuration and know-how live in one engineer's head, so the system degrades the week they move on.

    Prevented by Enable →

from our field notes

Architecture · Claude Code for teams and enterprise

Claude Code in CI/CD without handing it the keys

Headless Claude Code reviewing pull requests and fixing failing builds in GitHub Actions against Amazon Bedrock, with a trust boundary untrusted PR content can't cross and merging left to people.

Architecture · Agentic workflows and automation

Document extraction that knows when to ask a person

An event-driven pipeline that extracts structured data from documents with Claude on Amazon Bedrock, checks it against evidence, and sends only the doubtful cases to human review.

resources